PRODUCT LIABILITY UNDER UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON CONTRACTS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS (CISG) AND ETHIOPIAN LAW

Abstract

This article explores product liability by analyzing its treatment under the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) and Ethiopian law, specifically focusing on claims related to property damage and personal injuries caused by
defective products. The study begins by outlining the theoretical frameworks of product liability to underscore its complexity and significance. A crucial distinction is made between the two legal frameworks: while the CISG addresses claims for property damage, it does not encompass personal injury claims, thereby creating gaps in consumer protection. The methodology employed in this analysis includes a descriptive approach, which allows for a thorough examination of each legal framework, alongside a comparative study to highlight differences and similarities between the CISG and Ethiopian law. The findings indicate that Ethiopian law provides a more comprehensive basis for addressing both types of harm, in contrast to the limited scope of the CISG. This limitation suggests a need for reform. The study advocates amending the CISG to explicitly cover personal injury claims, enhancing Ethiopia's product liability framework, and improving legal awareness among relevant stakeholders. Ultimately, this article aims to clarify legal ambiguities and strengthen product liability protections, thus benefiting businesses, consumers, and the global marketplace.